BBC Documentary: The Birth of Israel - Best Definition
For your consideration:
1. Palestinian Jews had been living in this area of the world since before the destruction of the second temple and Roman sack of Jerusalem. The compelling question thus arises; should Palestine originally Judæa therefore be thought of as the Arab Palestinian homeland excluding in such definition Jews living here as other than Palestinian? It must be said that the term Palestine was imposed on the region as an insult following the Bar Kokhba revolt (132--136 CE).
2. Ottoman Turks governed Palestine from 1516. 400 years later in 1917 the British Empire wrestled Palestine from this hegemony.
3. Apparent contradiction lies in the fact that in 1920 Jews establishing in Palestine where required to obtain the land by purchase; again the burning question; so who profited from this hoax since at just this same there were attempts to force the Jewish population out.
4. During the Jewish immigration upon the impetus of the European Nazi movement, the Muslim population felt their lifestyle compromised or rather invalidated.
5. In Haifa until 1935 the protestant cleric Izz ad-Din al-Qassam chose to fight rather than recognize institutional Judaic theism and lose his followers.
6. Free jealous attacks on Jews resulted in the innovation of the Haganah with David Ben-Gurion, so Israel was thus created from the outside, as existential and essential necessity rather than being invented from some doctrinal source or motivation.
7. Haj Amin al-Husseini made a pact with Hitler to conquer Palestine, perpetuate the holocaust and destroy Jewish theists.
8. With Haj Amin al-Husseini cousin, Abd al-Qader al-Husseini the holy war army; Jaysh al-Jihad al-Muqaddas was thus invented and the eventual siege of Jerusalem.
9. The Haifa exodus of Muslims was in a broad sense voluntary, however not so much democratic as perpetrated at and on the command of leaders motivated by protestant paranoia; these leaders would plan, wait, regroup and attack from beyond, thus was manifest the ambition of king Abdullah I of Jordan, Yasser Arafat and company.
10. Many non Jewish inhabitants of Palestine did not join the exodus and had continued to live in what became Israel exhibiting herein the fact that ipso facto intolerance is a non Jewish expression.
11. Another question arises concerning the city of Jerusalem; since Jerusalem was the personal realization of the Jewish king David 1040--970 BCE, why would it at all interesting for any non Jew, unsympathetic with the historical David?
12. The problem is one of protestantism; there can be only one version of theism and this must forcibly be the original version. To which everyone must recognize and adhere, fault of which is to inevitably cede to hypocrisy thus blaming the Creator for making a mistake, this is intuitively understood by all.
13. Theism is of philosophical necessity; it is the unique remedy for presumption. The Protestant procedural wants needs to make believe that it possesses the system that corrects the error thus reducing the original to nothing more than a political scheme.
14. Any protestantism proves hypocritical, with a need to recourse toward the miraculous. This manifest in either the form of a; doctrine, messiah or whatever artifice or stratagem employed as operator to make it functional. Evidently such improvisation renders genuine science more or less possible. Ergo the authoritarian or tyrannical element.
Categories:
history
0 comments:
Post a Comment